Tuesday, May 31, 2005

A Mormon in the White House?

Is America ready for a Mormon president? And would evangelical Christians support a candidate who belongs to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Terry Eastland, publisher of The Weekly Standard, poses these questions in an article from the magazine's June 6 issue that examines the possible presidential candidacy of Mitt Romney, a Mormon and currently the Republican governor of Massachusetts.

In the article, Eastland points out: . . .

Protestants and Catholics who are serious about their Christian faith are likely to see Mormonism as heretical in key respects, even non-Christian. The historian and scholar of Mormonism Jan Shipps has described it as not a part of traditional Christianity as such but "a new religious tradition." Would such perceptions of Mormonism lead voters to decide they couldn't vote for Romney? The question is especially relevant with respect to evangelical Protestants, for three reasons. First, in sheer numbers they are the largest group in the Republican coalition, as defined by church affiliation. Second, they tend to be quite active during the primary season and can influence outcomes, especially in the South where they are most numerous. Third, while no Christian body accepts a Mormon baptism as valid, evangelicals have tended to be more critical of Latter-day Saints doctrine than mainline Protestants or Catholics, with some evangelicals (and more fundamentalists) labeling the church a "cult." Millet says that "the greatest tension" has been with evangelicals, who have written "most all of the anti-Mormon stuff."

What do evangelical leaders active in politically conservative circles say about a Romney candidacy? Many I asked were reluctant to be quoted by name. As one of them told me, "We have to work with Mormons." Over the past quarter-century Mormons have made common cause with politically conservative evangelicals (and Catholics) on a broad range of issues involving marriage, family, abortion, stem cells, pornography, and religious liberty. Moreover, Mormons have worked alongside evangelicals for many of the same candidates at election time.

Someone willing to go on the record was Charles Colson of Prison Fellowship. Notwithstanding his "fundamental" theological differences with Mormonism, Colson said, "I could in very good conscience support Romney," calling him "a first-rate guy in every respect" and "a social conservative on most of the issues we care about." Colson obviously wasn't declaring for Romney, but simply indicating that he would not in religious principle, so to speak, be opposed to Romney and indeed could find political reasons to support him. Whether he would actually do so, of course, would "all depend on what the lineup is" and "where each person stands." The other evangelical leaders I contacted took the same view. Colson offered the likely correct forecast: Romney's appeal to evangelicals might slacken if a competent evangelical or Catholic with social views similar to Romney's were in the race; on the other hand, Romney's stock with evangelicals might go up if he were pitted against candidates holding more liberal social views, regardless of their religion. One evangelical leader offered this succinct take on whether Romney's faith would hurt him in the primaries: "Against Giuliani, no. Against Frist, yes. Against [Rick] Santorum, yes. Against Arnold [Schwarzenegger, who is ineligible], no."

One thing that's currently in Romney's favor is that most Christians, both evangelical and mainline, are clueless as to what Mormonism is all about, with many believing it to be just another Christian denomination. However, I'm sure in the heat of the campaign Romney's political rivals will quickly find a way to educate the masses on the beliefs and practices of his faith.

Hat tip to Marvin Olasky at World Magazine Blog.


At Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:42:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

so, are you saying that you would expect evangelicals to oppose him once the particulars of his faith came out?

would you oppose him based on the particulars of his faith?

At Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:31:00 PM, Blogger Mickey McLean said...

Yes, I do think that many evangelicals would likely oppose him if they were aware of the non-Christian aspects of his faith.

As for me, although my beliefs differ considerably with the doctrines of the Mormon Church, I'm not sure that would be reason enough for me not to vote for him. I would have to weigh many other factors in my decision, especially who his opponent might be and what that opponent believes in or stands for.

At Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:51:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The "particulars of his faith"? Well, for starters, Mormons worship a dude named Mr. Smith- not Jesus Christ. If you don't believe me, attend a service on Easter or Christmas. It would be an odd day if Jesus was mentioned.

The Mormons are a cult. They worship a false prophet. They believe a god fornicated with the Virgin Mary, who later gave birth to Jesus AND Satan. They believe that if they are really good in this lifetime that they too will become gods of their own universe.

Put me down for an atheist- or a democrat.

the Heckler

At Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:38:00 AM, Blogger Toad734 said...

Good thing people in the south would never vote for someone from Massachesetts.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home