Monday, October 10, 2005

Who Shall Be Sovereign?

By Alexander Samuels

Last month, the Rev. Mark R. Rushdoony, who is president of The Chalcedon Foundation, wrote an article posted on the foundation's Web site titled "The Alternative to a Sovereign God." Who shall be sovereign, God or Man? According to Mark Rushdoony: . . .

The idea of God predestinating from eternity (Eph. 1:4-5) is offensive to many. The alternative to a decreeing God, however, is a spectator God, one who is Himself subject to the actions of men in time and history. Man wants to believe he is in control. Even Christians often want a God who only reacts to man, like an umpire or judge. To whatever extent we deny predestination to God, we thereby transfer it to man.

When men believe they control history, they are determined to do so, and great evils result because they must then control men and nations. Men must acquire and exercise power for such control. Fascism, communism, and socialism are recent examples of the results of men trying to determine the course of history.

Men try to control others by less austere, but still utopian, ideas of the future they hope to create. Determining man seeks to monopolize education. John Dewey was clear that the goals of public education should be the socialization of individuals, who would be fit citizens of the society he envisioned. Determining man seeks to control the economy and create a paper money because of the limitations imposed by taxes and debt. Determining man sees the state as the avenue by which he controls others. Such statists can even make democracy a tool of imperialism. The goal of controlling others, even for ostensibly good reasons, is an evil one. It is playing God and presuming the right to predestinate in His place.

Men who seek to control nations, armies, money, and individuals are not afraid to dictate morality. Either God rules and His law-word is authoritative, or man rules and
his law-word is authoritative. Denying God's sovereignty over time and eternity creates a void, and this is man's reason for such a denial. Men rush into the void they have defined. If God is not sovereign, man is. This is the faith of humanism, that man is a god, who in his own right knows or determines good and evil (Gen. 3:5).

Rather than man, it is God who has sovereign authority over His creation and everything in it. God sovereignly ordains everything that comes to pass. God's sovereignty can never be frustrated and nothing ever happens over which He is not in control. Even if God passively "permits" things to happen, He always has the power and right to intervene.

Although we may not always know what God's sovereign will is, we may know His preceptive will, which is revealed to us in His holy laws. "Love your enemies and do not steal" are examples of His preceptive will made known to us in His holy Word. God allows us to break His preceptive will but we never have the right to sin.

God's sovereignty is universal. It is absolute. Even though it is universal and absolute, it is the sovereignty of holiness, love and wisdom. Who of us would claim the sovereignty of these qualities in a man? Would we have the malice of Satan through man control the issues of our very lives? No - for even though the authority of God is limited only by Himself, that authority is controlled by His infinite perfection in holiness, love and wisdom.

Who shall be sovereign, God or man? Blessedly, God has predetermined that decision for us.

Alexander Samuels is a regular contributor to Carolina Christian Conservative.

2 Comments:

At Friday, October 14, 2005 10:22:00 AM, Anonymous Daryl said...

I'm glad it is not me, I've screwed up my life enough

 
At Monday, October 24, 2005 7:27:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree god is sovereign and in complete control. Do you feel God is in complete control of those who will be saved? ie Election etc?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home